Systems Architecture & Distributed Systems Topics
Large-scale distributed system design, service architecture, microservices patterns, global distribution strategies, scalability, and fault tolerance at the service/application layer. Covers microservices decomposition, caching strategies, API design, eventual consistency, multi-region systems, and architectural resilience patterns. Excludes storage and database optimization (see Database Engineering & Data Systems), data pipeline infrastructure (see Data Engineering & Analytics Infrastructure), and infrastructure platform design (see Cloud & Infrastructure).
Scalability and Code Organization
Focuses on designing software and codebases that remain maintainable and performant as features and user load grow. Areas include modularity and separation of concerns, component and API boundaries, when and how to refactor, trade offs between monolith and service oriented architectures, data partitioning and caching strategies, performance optimization, testing strategies, dependency management, code review practices, and patterns for maintainability and evolvability. Interview questions may ask candidates to reason about design choices, identify coupling and cohesion issues, and propose practical steps to evolve an existing codebase safely.
Technical Priorities and Challenges
Identify the team's current technical priorities, pain points, and technical roadmap including architecture, technical debt, platform and tooling constraints, and business intelligence or data infrastructure considerations. Candidates should be able to discuss the current data stack and workflows, trade offs between short term fixes and longer term redesigns, success criteria for technical initiatives in the first 90 days and first year, and how their technical experience and decisions would address the team constraints while aligning with product goals.
Architecture and Technical Trade Offs
Centers on system and solution design decisions and the trade offs inherent in architecture choices. Candidates should be able to identify alternatives, clarify constraints such as scale cost and team capability, and articulate trade offs like consistency versus availability, latency versus throughput, simplicity versus extensibility, monolith versus microservices, synchronous versus asynchronous patterns, database selection, caching strategies, and operational complexity. This topic covers methods for quantifying or qualitatively evaluating impacts, prototyping and measuring performance, planning incremental migrations, documenting decisions, and proposing mitigation and monitoring plans to manage risk and maintainability.
Trade Off Analysis and Decision Frameworks
Covers the practice of structured trade off evaluation and repeatable decision processes across product and technical domains. Topics include enumerating alternatives, defining evaluation criteria such as cost risk time to market and user impact, building scoring matrices and weighted models, running sensitivity or scenario analysis, documenting assumptions, surfacing constraints, and communicating clear recommendations with mitigation plans. Interviewers will assess the candidate's ability to justify choices logically, quantify impacts when possible, and explain governance or escalation mechanisms used to make consistent decisions.
Project Deep Dives and Technical Decisions
Detailed personal walkthroughs of real projects the candidate designed, built, or contributed to, with an emphasis on the technical decisions they made or influenced. Candidates should be prepared to describe the problem statement, business and technical requirements, constraints, stakeholder expectations, success criteria, and their specific role and ownership. The explanation should cover system architecture and component choices, technology and service selection and rationale, data models and data flows, deployment and operational approach, and how scalability, reliability, security, cost, and performance concerns were addressed. Candidates should also explain alternatives considered, trade off analysis, debugging and mitigation steps taken, testing and validation approaches, collaboration with stakeholders and team members, measurable outcomes and impact, and lessons learned or improvements they would make in hindsight. Interviewers use these narratives to assess depth of ownership, end to end technical competence, decision making under constraints, trade off reasoning, and the ability to communicate complex technical narratives clearly and concisely.
Solution Architecture and Design
Designing and architecting end to end technical solutions for enterprise and complex systems, covering both the methodology for approaching architecture problems and the practical component level design work. Candidates should demonstrate a repeatable structured approach to elicit and document functional and non functional requirements, identify constraints and stakeholders, evaluate and compare multiple architectural options, and justify technology choices. They should produce high level and component level designs that show major services, presentation layers, application tiers, data layers, data flows, storage strategies, application programming interfaces, integration points with external and third party systems, and data movement and transformation. Strong responses explicitly address quality attributes such as scalability, performance, availability, fault tolerance, reliability, consistency and security as well as compliance and data protection concerns. Operational concerns must be covered including deployment topology, multi region and hybrid cloud strategies, monitoring and observability, logging, capacity planning, backup and disaster recovery, deployment and release strategies, maintenance, and operational run books. Candidates should discuss communication patterns including synchronous remote procedure calls and asynchronous messaging, storage trade offs between relational and non relational datastores and data warehouses, failure modes and mitigation strategies, incremental evolution and migration paths, and cost and feasibility constraints. Interviewers assess the ability to present clear diagrams, explain interactions and failure modes, reason about trade offs, and justify design decisions against requirements and constraints.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Focuses on frameworks, heuristics, and judgment used to make timely, defensible choices when information is incomplete, conflicting, or evolving. Topics include diagnosing unknowns, defining decision criteria, weighing probabilities and impacts, expected value and cost benefit thinking, setting contingency and rollback triggers, risk tolerance and mitigation, and communicating uncertainty to stakeholders. This area also covers when to prototype or run experiments versus making an operational decision, how to escalate appropriately, trade off analysis under time pressure, and the ways senior candidates incorporate strategic considerations and organizational constraints into choices.